<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 281 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339778</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the adjudication orders had attained finality, and the petitioner did not appeal despite being aware of the proceedings. The court found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s claims, emphasizing the lack of filed affidavits by the respondents and the necessity of the original order for initiating the appeal process. The court highlighted the petitioner&#039;s non-appearance in adjudication proceedings and the delay in filing the writ petition, ultimately concluding that directing the Authorities to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation would serve no purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 09:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 281 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339778</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the adjudication orders had attained finality, and the petitioner did not appeal despite being aware of the proceedings. The court found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s claims, emphasizing the lack of filed affidavits by the respondents and the necessity of the original order for initiating the appeal process. The court highlighted the petitioner&#039;s non-appearance in adjudication proceedings and the delay in filing the writ petition, ultimately concluding that directing the Authorities to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation would serve no purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>