<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 279 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339776</link>
    <description>A proviso restricting input tax credit under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act was confined to the specific inter-State sales clause to which it was attached and could not, by implication, be extended to other independently listed purposes in Section 19(2). On that reading, manufacturers using purchased goods for manufacturing and processing remained entitled to input tax credit. The availability of appeal or revision did not bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge concerned the assessing authority&#039;s power to reverse credit on an erroneous statutory interpretation, so the writ petitions were entertained and the reversal orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 279 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339776</link>
      <description>A proviso restricting input tax credit under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act was confined to the specific inter-State sales clause to which it was attached and could not, by implication, be extended to other independently listed purposes in Section 19(2). On that reading, manufacturers using purchased goods for manufacturing and processing remained entitled to input tax credit. The availability of appeal or revision did not bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge concerned the assessing authority&#039;s power to reverse credit on an erroneous statutory interpretation, so the writ petitions were entertained and the reversal orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>