<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 259 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339756</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the assessment conducted in the HUF status due to the failure to issue a notice in the individual status. Emphasizing the necessity of issuing notices in the correct status for assessments, the Tribunal held that the assessment in the HUF status was invalid. The decision highlighted compliance with the provisions of the Income Tax Act regarding the issuance of notices in the appropriate status for assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 259 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339756</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the assessment conducted in the HUF status due to the failure to issue a notice in the individual status. Emphasizing the necessity of issuing notices in the correct status for assessments, the Tribunal held that the assessment in the HUF status was invalid. The decision highlighted compliance with the provisions of the Income Tax Act regarding the issuance of notices in the appropriate status for assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>