<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 256 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339753</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer concerning the valuation of closing stock of sugar. The Court found the valuation at the levy sugar price appropriate due to the legal obligation on the assessee to supply levy sugar. Additionally, the non-production of the stock register did not impact the accuracy of the total sugar stock figures, which were accepted as correct. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the questions of law were decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 256 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339753</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer concerning the valuation of closing stock of sugar. The Court found the valuation at the levy sugar price appropriate due to the legal obligation on the assessee to supply levy sugar. Additionally, the non-production of the stock register did not impact the accuracy of the total sugar stock figures, which were accepted as correct. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the questions of law were decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>