<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (9) TMI 3 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6980</link>
    <description>An exemption notification was construed on its own terms, so dividend income covered by the notification was fully exempt from super-tax and was not reduced by any proportionate share of business expenses or losses. Where the assessee carried on a single business yielding both exempt and taxable income, allowable business expenditure could not be apportioned merely because part of the receipts was exempt; the full allowable expenditure or loss had to be deducted against the taxable income. The reference was therefore answered in favour of the assessee on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (9) TMI 3 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6980</link>
      <description>An exemption notification was construed on its own terms, so dividend income covered by the notification was fully exempt from super-tax and was not reduced by any proportionate share of business expenses or losses. Where the assessee carried on a single business yielding both exempt and taxable income, allowable business expenditure could not be apportioned merely because part of the receipts was exempt; the full allowable expenditure or loss had to be deducted against the taxable income. The reference was therefore answered in favour of the assessee on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>