<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 946 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190864</link>
    <description>Issue 1 involved the addition of Rs. 50 lakhs under section 68 of the IT Act, treating gifts as non-genuine. The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision, as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the gifts. Issue 2 pertained to the validity of reopening the assessment under section 147 based on suspicion. The Tribunal found the reasons for reopening lacked concrete evidence and quashed the reassessment. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:26:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 946 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190864</link>
      <description>Issue 1 involved the addition of Rs. 50 lakhs under section 68 of the IT Act, treating gifts as non-genuine. The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision, as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the gifts. Issue 2 pertained to the validity of reopening the assessment under section 147 based on suspicion. The Tribunal found the reasons for reopening lacked concrete evidence and quashed the reassessment. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>