<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 232 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339729</link>
    <description>Chenille fabrics were held classifiable under Tariff Heading 5801 because the assessee&#039;s own records described the goods as chenille fabrics or made-ups, and chenille yarn was used as input. The predominance test for composite textiles was held inapplicable because Section Note 2(A) of Section XI does not override a tariff entry that specifically covers chenille fabrics. Revenue neutrality was rejected as no answer to an incorrect classification or an exemption claim contrary to the tariff entry. The department&#039;s classification was upheld, the exemption claim failed, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 232 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339729</link>
      <description>Chenille fabrics were held classifiable under Tariff Heading 5801 because the assessee&#039;s own records described the goods as chenille fabrics or made-ups, and chenille yarn was used as input. The predominance test for composite textiles was held inapplicable because Section Note 2(A) of Section XI does not override a tariff entry that specifically covers chenille fabrics. Revenue neutrality was rejected as no answer to an incorrect classification or an exemption claim contrary to the tariff entry. The department&#039;s classification was upheld, the exemption claim failed, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>