<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 230 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339727</link>
    <description>On merger of two manufacturing units, the unutilised balance in the Personal Ledger Account of the erstwhile unit was treated as transferable to the successor unit because the merged entity inherited the assets and liabilities of the earlier unit. The PLA balance was regarded as cash belonging to the company and, therefore, an asset passing with the merger. The absence of a specific procedural provision for PLA transfer did not prevent transfer, since a refund route was impracticable after the earlier unit had ceased to exist and only the successor remained in law. The contrary demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 12:09:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 230 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339727</link>
      <description>On merger of two manufacturing units, the unutilised balance in the Personal Ledger Account of the erstwhile unit was treated as transferable to the successor unit because the merged entity inherited the assets and liabilities of the earlier unit. The PLA balance was regarded as cash belonging to the company and, therefore, an asset passing with the merger. The absence of a specific procedural provision for PLA transfer did not prevent transfer, since a refund route was impracticable after the earlier unit had ceased to exist and only the successor remained in law. The contrary demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>