<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 229 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339726</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is liable to pay duty on Ethyl Acetate cleared for denaturing purposes, considering it as a final product under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The decision was influenced by previous rulings in favor of the appellant, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 12:09:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 229 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339726</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is liable to pay duty on Ethyl Acetate cleared for denaturing purposes, considering it as a final product under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The decision was influenced by previous rulings in favor of the appellant, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>