<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 224 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339721</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee and against the department, dismissing the appeal. The Court found no exceptional circumstances to allow delay condonation, ruling that the rejection of the condonation application and the decision on marketable excisable goods were justified. The appeal was dismissed with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 224 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339721</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee and against the department, dismissing the appeal. The Court found no exceptional circumstances to allow delay condonation, ruling that the rejection of the condonation application and the decision on marketable excisable goods were justified. The appeal was dismissed with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>