<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (9) TMI 1 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6971</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the dividends received from a private limited company and paid to family members as per the company&#039;s articles of association were diverted at the source and should be excluded from the assessee&#039;s total income. The court affirmed the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, stating that the payments to family members were pursuant to the company&#039;s directions and not an application of the assessee&#039;s own income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (9) TMI 1 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6971</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the dividends received from a private limited company and paid to family members as per the company&#039;s articles of association were diverted at the source and should be excluded from the assessee&#039;s total income. The court affirmed the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, stating that the payments to family members were pursuant to the company&#039;s directions and not an application of the assessee&#039;s own income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>