https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339700 The court upheld the order of purchase dated 27th September 1995, finding it compliant with legal requirements and principles of natural justice. The petitioner's claim for revesting the property due to alleged non-payment of full sale consideration was rejected as the court determined that the apparent consideration had been paid to the transferor. Additionally, the court clarified that the transferee was not entitled to claim revesting under Section 269UH. The writ application was dismissed, with the court ruling against the petitioner on all issues raised. en-us Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 May 2017 13:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339700 The court upheld the order of purchase dated 27th September 1995, finding it compliant with legal requirements and principles of natural justice. The petitioner's claim for revesting the property due to alleged non-payment of full sale consideration was rejected as the court determined that the apparent consideration had been paid to the transferor. Additionally, the court clarified that the transferee was not entitled to claim revesting under Section 269UH. The writ application was dismissed, with the court ruling against the petitioner on all issues raised. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339700