<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 184 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339681</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the classification of income from share transactions as capital gains was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s consistent treatment of transactions as investments. Regarding the addition of unexplained cash credits under Section 68, the Tribunal found the AO&#039;s actions lacking, noting the failure to disallow corresponding purchases and the absence of further inquiries to disprove the assessee&#039;s claims. The Tribunal reversed the lower authorities&#039; decisions, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleting the addition under Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:05:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 184 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339681</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the classification of income from share transactions as capital gains was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s consistent treatment of transactions as investments. Regarding the addition of unexplained cash credits under Section 68, the Tribunal found the AO&#039;s actions lacking, noting the failure to disallow corresponding purchases and the absence of further inquiries to disprove the assessee&#039;s claims. The Tribunal reversed the lower authorities&#039; decisions, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleting the addition under Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>