<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1169 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271B for failure to furnish a Tax Audit Report by the specified date, considering the delay beyond the assessee&#039;s control due to statutory audit requirements. The Tribunal deemed the delay technical and not deliberate, as the report was eventually filed with the income return. Consequently, the penalty was cancelled, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 18:46:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1169 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271B for failure to furnish a Tax Audit Report by the specified date, considering the delay beyond the assessee&#039;s control due to statutory audit requirements. The Tribunal deemed the delay technical and not deliberate, as the report was eventually filed with the income return. Consequently, the penalty was cancelled, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>