<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (3) TMI 35 - MYSORE High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6966</link>
    <description>Section 22(1) of Mysore Act 29 of 1963 required appeals and revision applications pending before the Commissioner under the unamended Mysore Agricultural Income-tax Act to stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and be disposed of as if preferred under amended section 34. On that footing, objections based on pre-amendment maintainability could not control the transferred matter. The Tribunal had to treat the transferred appeal as within its jurisdiction and decide it on merits, so dismissal in limine was incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (3) TMI 35 - MYSORE High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6966</link>
      <description>Section 22(1) of Mysore Act 29 of 1963 required appeals and revision applications pending before the Commissioner under the unamended Mysore Agricultural Income-tax Act to stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and be disposed of as if preferred under amended section 34. On that footing, objections based on pre-amendment maintainability could not control the transferred matter. The Tribunal had to treat the transferred appeal as within its jurisdiction and decide it on merits, so dismissal in limine was incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>