https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339671 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD was allowed by way of remand to the Commissioner (Appeals) for hearing along with the main appeal. The appellant, the Executive Director of M/s Rhodium Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd., initially filed a composite appeal within the prescribed time limit. Subsequently, a separate appeal was filed after the condonable period due to a procedural mistake. The Member (Judicial) considered the circumstances and opined that justice should not be denied, leading to the decision to remand the appeal for a fair hearing without setting a precedent. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Mar 2017 15:13:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339671 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD was allowed by way of remand to the Commissioner (Appeals) for hearing along with the main appeal. The appellant, the Executive Director of M/s Rhodium Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd., initially filed a composite appeal within the prescribed time limit. Subsequently, a separate appeal was filed after the condonable period due to a procedural mistake. The Member (Judicial) considered the circumstances and opined that justice should not be denied, leading to the decision to remand the appeal for a fair hearing without setting a precedent. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339671