<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 171 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that goods falling under Chapter Heading 7610, used for making cooling rooms, did not qualify as capital goods for Cenvat Credit. Despite their necessity for temperature control, the goods did not meet the defined criteria. Previous judgments emphasizing alignment with the capital goods definition were cited. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowance of credit based on the goods&#039; usage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 171 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that goods falling under Chapter Heading 7610, used for making cooling rooms, did not qualify as capital goods for Cenvat Credit. Despite their necessity for temperature control, the goods did not meet the defined criteria. Previous judgments emphasizing alignment with the capital goods definition were cited. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowance of credit based on the goods&#039; usage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>