<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 166 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339663</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI set aside the impugned order regarding the classification of goods under Tariff headings 5401.01 and 5606.00. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s goods were correctly classified as &quot;Corespun Sewing Thread&quot; under Tariff heading 5401.01 and that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient reasons for disputing this classification. Due to the lack of proper notice and reasoning in the show cause notice, the impugned order was deemed to violate principles of natural justice, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant based on the precedent established in a previous case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 166 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339663</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI set aside the impugned order regarding the classification of goods under Tariff headings 5401.01 and 5606.00. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s goods were correctly classified as &quot;Corespun Sewing Thread&quot; under Tariff heading 5401.01 and that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient reasons for disputing this classification. Due to the lack of proper notice and reasoning in the show cause notice, the impugned order was deemed to violate principles of natural justice, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant based on the precedent established in a previous case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>