<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 162 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339659</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the revocation of the respondent&#039;s Customs House Agent&#039;s license by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal found the respondent failed to properly verify the particulars of the represented party, but the Court held that the obligation for physical verification was misplaced based on the existing partnership firm&#039;s registration and the documents verified by the respondent. The Court referenced previous judgments, including Commissioner of Customs Vs. Him Logistics Pvt. Ltd., and concluded that no substantial question of law arose, ultimately dismissing the appeal and related applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 162 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339659</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the revocation of the respondent&#039;s Customs House Agent&#039;s license by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal found the respondent failed to properly verify the particulars of the represented party, but the Court held that the obligation for physical verification was misplaced based on the existing partnership firm&#039;s registration and the documents verified by the respondent. The Court referenced previous judgments, including Commissioner of Customs Vs. Him Logistics Pvt. Ltd., and concluded that no substantial question of law arose, ultimately dismissing the appeal and related applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>