https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339657 Suspension of a customs house agent's licence under Regulation 20(2) was upheld where it rested on an order-in-original under customs penalty proceedings that found complicity and imposed penalty. The Court treated that order as a sufficient basis for invoking the suspension power, noted that the initial suspension was made within the prescribed time after receipt of the order, and accepted that the agent had been heard before the final order. Although an appellate remedy existed, that did not by itself exclude writ jurisdiction, but no jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, perversity, or absence of reasons was shown. The challenge therefore failed. en-us Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339657 Suspension of a customs house agent's licence under Regulation 20(2) was upheld where it rested on an order-in-original under customs penalty proceedings that found complicity and imposed penalty. The Court treated that order as a sufficient basis for invoking the suspension power, noted that the initial suspension was made within the prescribed time after receipt of the order, and accepted that the agent had been heard before the final order. Although an appellate remedy existed, that did not by itself exclude writ jurisdiction, but no jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, perversity, or absence of reasons was shown. The challenge therefore failed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339657