<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revision Upheld u/s 263: CIT Corrects AO&#039;s Oversight Due to Lack of Necessary Inquiries in Tax Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33555</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - The absence of the word “erroneous order” is not very fatal as reading of the entire order of the CIT would go to show that he was of the view that order of the AO was erroneous because the AO failed to make proper enquiries which were warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:49:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:49:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revision Upheld u/s 263: CIT Corrects AO&#039;s Oversight Due to Lack of Necessary Inquiries in Tax Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33555</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - The absence of the word “erroneous order” is not very fatal as reading of the entire order of the CIT would go to show that he was of the view that order of the AO was erroneous because the AO failed to make proper enquiries which were warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:49:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>