<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 139 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339636</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT-A&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of compensation received from subletting a property as income from House Property for tax purposes. The ITAT referenced legal precedents, including section 27(iiib) of the Income Tax Act, to support its conclusion. Additionally, the ITAT affirmed that only deductions provided under the computation of house property income were permissible, dismissing the appeal and upholding the CIT-A&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 139 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339636</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT-A&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of compensation received from subletting a property as income from House Property for tax purposes. The ITAT referenced legal precedents, including section 27(iiib) of the Income Tax Act, to support its conclusion. Additionally, the ITAT affirmed that only deductions provided under the computation of house property income were permissible, dismissing the appeal and upholding the CIT-A&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>