<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 137 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339634</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the Assessing Officer could not charge late fees under Section 234E through intimation under Section 200A for defaults before 01.06.2015. The demand for fees was invalidated and deleted, with the Tribunal confirming the maintainability of appeals against such intimations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:49:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 137 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339634</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the Assessing Officer could not charge late fees under Section 234E through intimation under Section 200A for defaults before 01.06.2015. The demand for fees was invalidated and deleted, with the Tribunal confirming the maintainability of appeals against such intimations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>