<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 136 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339633</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2005-06 and 2006-07, as the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C was deemed invalid due to the AO&#039;s failure to record satisfaction notes. Consequently, the assessments for these years were canceled. The issues concerning the estimation of unaccounted sales, gross profit, and levy of interest were not adjudicated due to the invalidity of the assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:49:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 136 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339633</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2005-06 and 2006-07, as the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C was deemed invalid due to the AO&#039;s failure to record satisfaction notes. Consequently, the assessments for these years were canceled. The issues concerning the estimation of unaccounted sales, gross profit, and levy of interest were not adjudicated due to the invalidity of the assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>