<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1717 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision on the application of section 14A of the Income Tax Act, concerning interest disallowance. The Assessing Officer was instructed to allow the assessee an opportunity to prove the mixed nature of funds and their components, without applying Rule 8D. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 10:55:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1717 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision on the application of section 14A of the Income Tax Act, concerning interest disallowance. The Assessing Officer was instructed to allow the assessee an opportunity to prove the mixed nature of funds and their components, without applying Rule 8D. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>