<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1091 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the disallowance u/s 14A made by the Assessing Officer using Rule 8D for the assessment year 2007-2008. Citing inapplicability of Rule 8D for that year, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision without invoking the rule. The Tribunal referred to a previous case and directed a reconsideration based on a relevant High Court judgment. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2017 10:40:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1091 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the disallowance u/s 14A made by the Assessing Officer using Rule 8D for the assessment year 2007-2008. Citing inapplicability of Rule 8D for that year, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision without invoking the rule. The Tribunal referred to a previous case and directed a reconsideration based on a relevant High Court judgment. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>