<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (1) TMI 24 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6955</link>
    <description>Wealth-tax valuation under section 7(2) is ordinarily based on the balance-sheet figure, subject to adjustment only where acceptable reasons justify departure or the figure is shown to be incorrect. A factual inference of non-recoverability may be drawn from the ordinary course of conduct, even without direct evidence, so an advance paid as bonus to employees was treated as not constituting an asset. The meaning of &quot;set up&quot; in the exemption provision for a new industrial undertaking was applied in line with the later Supreme Court interpretation. The valuation question was left for reconsideration on the stated legal rule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (1) TMI 24 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6955</link>
      <description>Wealth-tax valuation under section 7(2) is ordinarily based on the balance-sheet figure, subject to adjustment only where acceptable reasons justify departure or the figure is shown to be incorrect. A factual inference of non-recoverability may be drawn from the ordinary course of conduct, even without direct evidence, so an advance paid as bonus to employees was treated as not constituting an asset. The meaning of &quot;set up&quot; in the exemption provision for a new industrial undertaking was applied in line with the later Supreme Court interpretation. The valuation question was left for reconsideration on the stated legal rule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>