<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 123 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339620</link>
    <description>Minor stock shortages in input records were held insufficient to deny Cenvat credit where there was no allegation or evidence of diversion or clandestine removal and the overall variation was negligible. The record showed both excess and shortage in different inputs, with total variation of only 0.22% to 0.23% of inputs received. In that factual context, the requirement to maintain records did not justify disallowance of credit, and the credit denial was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 20:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 123 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339620</link>
      <description>Minor stock shortages in input records were held insufficient to deny Cenvat credit where there was no allegation or evidence of diversion or clandestine removal and the overall variation was negligible. The record showed both excess and shortage in different inputs, with total variation of only 0.22% to 0.23% of inputs received. In that factual context, the requirement to maintain records did not justify disallowance of credit, and the credit denial was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>