<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1328 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, confirming the additions made by the AO for unaccounted local sales of gold. The decision was based on discrepancies in gold purity, reliance on previous judicial precedents, and inadequacy of new evidence. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order in line with the High Court&#039;s judgment, declining to interfere in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 16:56:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1328 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, confirming the additions made by the AO for unaccounted local sales of gold. The decision was based on discrepancies in gold purity, reliance on previous judicial precedents, and inadequacy of new evidence. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order in line with the High Court&#039;s judgment, declining to interfere in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>