<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 885 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190835</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the civil appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The order records no substantive reasoning on the excise dispute and provides no further legal analysis or relief beyond disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 15:57:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 885 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190835</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the civil appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The order records no substantive reasoning on the excise dispute and provides no further legal analysis or relief beyond disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>