https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339619 Refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was treated as admissible for port-related charges, GTA services, invoice documentation and CHA services where earlier Tribunal rulings had accepted such claims despite objections on classification, proof of tax payment and invoice form. Refund was also held admissible for bank charges incurred for realization of export proceeds because the vouchers showed a direct nexus with exported goods, and procedural defects in supporting documents did not justify denial. The common order granted substantial relief, subject to the portions not pressed by the appellants. en-us Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Mar 2017 06:52:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339619 Refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was treated as admissible for port-related charges, GTA services, invoice documentation and CHA services where earlier Tribunal rulings had accepted such claims despite objections on classification, proof of tax payment and invoice form. Refund was also held admissible for bank charges incurred for realization of export proceeds because the vouchers showed a direct nexus with exported goods, and procedural defects in supporting documents did not justify denial. The common order granted substantial relief, subject to the portions not pressed by the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339619