<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 114 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339611</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the reassessment proceedings for AY 2009-10. It ruled that there was no tangible material to justify the reopening of the assessment, as the evidence relied upon was deemed insufficient and based on conjecture and surmise. Consequently, the court declared the notices invalid, allowing the petitions filed by the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 114 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339611</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the reassessment proceedings for AY 2009-10. It ruled that there was no tangible material to justify the reopening of the assessment, as the evidence relied upon was deemed insufficient and based on conjecture and surmise. Consequently, the court declared the notices invalid, allowing the petitions filed by the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>