<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 106 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339603</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding transfer pricing adjustments to royalty payments. The Court found that the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s reduction of the royalty rate lacked a valid basis and was considered arbitrary and lacking legal support. The High Court concluded that there was no substantial question of law for consideration, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 06:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 106 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339603</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding transfer pricing adjustments to royalty payments. The Court found that the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s reduction of the royalty rate lacked a valid basis and was considered arbitrary and lacking legal support. The High Court concluded that there was no substantial question of law for consideration, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>