<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 912 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190825</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the interest addition related to borrowings for investment in the sister-concern, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to verify the conditions for bad debts claimed under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 912 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190825</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the interest addition related to borrowings for investment in the sister-concern, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to verify the conditions for bad debts claimed under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>