<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 91 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339588</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition challenging a valuation order under the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing the petitioner to raise objections before the Assessing Officer during assessment proceedings. Emphasizing the importance of providing genuine opportunities for hearing, the judgment highlights the statutory remedy available to the assessee under section 142A(7) and underscores the significance of following proper procedures in valuation matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:58:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 91 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339588</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition challenging a valuation order under the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing the petitioner to raise objections before the Assessing Officer during assessment proceedings. Emphasizing the importance of providing genuine opportunities for hearing, the judgment highlights the statutory remedy available to the assessee under section 142A(7) and underscores the significance of following proper procedures in valuation matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>