https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339582 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. It decided in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of bad debts, the allowability of depreciation on uninterrupted power supply, and the payment of Rs. 2.62 crores due to sub-broker irregularities. However, the issue under Section 14A was sent back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The decision was announced on 22nd February 2017. en-us Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:58:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339582 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. It decided in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of bad debts, the allowability of depreciation on uninterrupted power supply, and the payment of Rs. 2.62 crores due to sub-broker irregularities. However, the issue under Section 14A was sent back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The decision was announced on 22nd February 2017. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339582