<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 84 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339581</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the treatment of a loss as &#039;business loss&#039; instead of &#039;capital loss&#039; for the assessment year 2008-09. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the consistent treatment of transactions as business activities by the assessee, in line with CBDT Circular No. 6/2016. The historical treatment of profits from investments as business income supported the conclusion that the loss was incurred in the course of the assessee&#039;s business activities. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the characterization of the loss as a &#039;business loss&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:58:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 84 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339581</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the treatment of a loss as &#039;business loss&#039; instead of &#039;capital loss&#039; for the assessment year 2008-09. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the consistent treatment of transactions as business activities by the assessee, in line with CBDT Circular No. 6/2016. The historical treatment of profits from investments as business income supported the conclusion that the loss was incurred in the course of the assessee&#039;s business activities. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the characterization of the loss as a &#039;business loss&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>