<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 82 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339579</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) due to procedural lapses and lack of specificity in the penalty notice, violating principles of natural justice. The decision emphasized the importance of clear and specific charges in penalty notices for fair proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:58:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 82 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339579</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) due to procedural lapses and lack of specificity in the penalty notice, violating principles of natural justice. The decision emphasized the importance of clear and specific charges in penalty notices for fair proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>