<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 74 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339571</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment was invalid and the addition of Rs. 15,00,000 as share application money was not justified. Emphasizing the importance of proving the source of funds and genuineness of transactions, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted the addition. The decision highlighted procedural irregularities, lack of evidence for the addition, and the necessity of adhering to legal principles in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 74 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339571</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment was invalid and the addition of Rs. 15,00,000 as share application money was not justified. Emphasizing the importance of proving the source of funds and genuineness of transactions, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted the addition. The decision highlighted procedural irregularities, lack of evidence for the addition, and the necessity of adhering to legal principles in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>