<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 71 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339568</link>
    <description>The High Court acknowledged the petitioner&#039;s deposit of 69% of the total liability with the Revenue and directed the Tribunal to promptly address restoration applications. The Court stayed the recovery notice pending restoration proceedings, allowing the Tribunal to maintain the stay if the appeal is reinstated. The writ petition was resolved accordingly, with associated miscellaneous petitions concluded and costs simplified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:57:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 71 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339568</link>
      <description>The High Court acknowledged the petitioner&#039;s deposit of 69% of the total liability with the Revenue and directed the Tribunal to promptly address restoration applications. The Court stayed the recovery notice pending restoration proceedings, allowing the Tribunal to maintain the stay if the appeal is reinstated. The writ petition was resolved accordingly, with associated miscellaneous petitions concluded and costs simplified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>