<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 66 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339563</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax credit for exported services was held to be unavailable where the output services were exported from an unregistered premises, because the refund notification required the claim to be filed before the jurisdictional authority over the registered premises and such fiscal benefit had to be strictly construed. The claimant therefore had to satisfy the mandatory registration condition, which was not met. In export of service cases, the relevant date for limitation was clarified as the date of realisation of foreign exchange. On that basis, the refund claims were found contrary to the governing notification requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 66 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339563</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax credit for exported services was held to be unavailable where the output services were exported from an unregistered premises, because the refund notification required the claim to be filed before the jurisdictional authority over the registered premises and such fiscal benefit had to be strictly construed. The claimant therefore had to satisfy the mandatory registration condition, which was not met. In export of service cases, the relevant date for limitation was clarified as the date of realisation of foreign exchange. On that basis, the refund claims were found contrary to the governing notification requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>