<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 65 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339562</link>
    <description>The appeal was made by the legal heir of a deceased assessee against an order-in-appeal for short-paid service tax levy. The appellant sought abatement of proceedings, but the request was denied, resulting in the confirmation of duty, interest, and penalty. The Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court clarified that the machinery provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act do not extend to cases involving deceased individuals. The Court held that there is no charge to excise duty on a deceased person under the main charging provision, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 65 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339562</link>
      <description>The appeal was made by the legal heir of a deceased assessee against an order-in-appeal for short-paid service tax levy. The appellant sought abatement of proceedings, but the request was denied, resulting in the confirmation of duty, interest, and penalty. The Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court clarified that the machinery provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act do not extend to cases involving deceased individuals. The Court held that there is no charge to excise duty on a deceased person under the main charging provision, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>