<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 55 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339552</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the misdeclaration of quantity and value in import, leading to the imposition of a redemption fine of Rs. 2,00,000 and penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s objections were overruled, with the Tribunal upholding the assessable value determined by Customs and the penalties imposed due to established misdeclarations. The appeal was partly allowed, maintaining the penalty and confirming the duty not disputed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:56:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 55 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339552</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the misdeclaration of quantity and value in import, leading to the imposition of a redemption fine of Rs. 2,00,000 and penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s objections were overruled, with the Tribunal upholding the assessable value determined by Customs and the penalties imposed due to established misdeclarations. The appeal was partly allowed, maintaining the penalty and confirming the duty not disputed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>