<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 49 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339546</link>
    <description>Withdrawal of a special leave petition does not amount to dismissal on merits or grant of leave, and therefore does not by itself bar a statutory review before the High Court. The Court applied Order XV Rule 9 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and treated the withdrawn proceeding as if it had not been preferred. On that basis, the earlier withdrawal of the SLP did not take away the review remedy, and the preliminary objection to maintainability was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:55:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 49 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339546</link>
      <description>Withdrawal of a special leave petition does not amount to dismissal on merits or grant of leave, and therefore does not by itself bar a statutory review before the High Court. The Court applied Order XV Rule 9 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and treated the withdrawn proceeding as if it had not been preferred. On that basis, the earlier withdrawal of the SLP did not take away the review remedy, and the preliminary objection to maintainability was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>