<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (5) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6936</link>
    <description>A present and ascertainable statutory or enforceable liability is a debt deductible in computing net wealth, even if exact quantification or payment follows later. On that basis, the provision for employees&#039; bonus was deductible because the liability had become enforceable and had been admitted by the assessee, with advances also made against it. The provision for income-tax was deductible because tax liability becomes a debt once it is a present obligation capable of ascertainment. The same reasoning applied to sales tax, as liability arose from taxable turnover and was not a mere contingency. The disputed provisions were therefore deductible in computing net wealth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (5) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6936</link>
      <description>A present and ascertainable statutory or enforceable liability is a debt deductible in computing net wealth, even if exact quantification or payment follows later. On that basis, the provision for employees&#039; bonus was deductible because the liability had become enforceable and had been admitted by the assessee, with advances also made against it. The provision for income-tax was deductible because tax liability becomes a debt once it is a present obligation capable of ascertainment. The same reasoning applied to sales tax, as liability arose from taxable turnover and was not a mere contingency. The disputed provisions were therefore deductible in computing net wealth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>