<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 46 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339543</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal challenging the Assessment Order, condoning the delay. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was directed to decide the appeal without being influenced by the observations in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:06:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 46 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339543</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal challenging the Assessment Order, condoning the delay. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was directed to decide the appeal without being influenced by the observations in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>