<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 44 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339541</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order imposing a penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized that penalties should not apply when transactions are genuine, revenue is unaffected, and parties act in good faith. It highlighted that technical errors should not result in penalties, particularly when parties believe their actions are lawful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 44 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339541</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order imposing a penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized that penalties should not apply when transactions are genuine, revenue is unaffected, and parties act in good faith. It highlighted that technical errors should not result in penalties, particularly when parties believe their actions are lawful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>