<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 33 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339530</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s return and notes were required to be read as a whole, and the voluntary offer of income did not amount to acceptance of a service permanent establishment for the relevant period under Article 5(2)(k) of the India-UK Tax Treaty. The Tribunal noted that the assessee specifically claimed the 90-day threshold for November 2008 to March 2009 was not exceeded, and that the lower authorities had not dealt with the treaty conditions in a reasoned manner. The finding of a permanent establishment for that period was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication by a speaking order after considering the assessee&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:05:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 33 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339530</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s return and notes were required to be read as a whole, and the voluntary offer of income did not amount to acceptance of a service permanent establishment for the relevant period under Article 5(2)(k) of the India-UK Tax Treaty. The Tribunal noted that the assessee specifically claimed the 90-day threshold for November 2008 to March 2009 was not exceeded, and that the lower authorities had not dealt with the treaty conditions in a reasoned manner. The finding of a permanent establishment for that period was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication by a speaking order after considering the assessee&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>