<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 23 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339520</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the invalidity of the notice issued by the Assessing Officer. The judgment emphasized the necessity of specifying the grounds for penalty in the notice, as required by legal precedents, resulting in the annulment of the penalty order in this instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:05:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 23 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339520</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the invalidity of the notice issued by the Assessing Officer. The judgment emphasized the necessity of specifying the grounds for penalty in the notice, as required by legal precedents, resulting in the annulment of the penalty order in this instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>