<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 21 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for verification of foreign exchange receipts and related documentation. The Original Adjudicating Authority was directed to finalize the matter within two months, granting the appellant an opportunity to provide certified documents to support their claim. The decision affirmed the appellant&#039;s entitlement to a refund under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, subject to satisfactory verification of foreign exchange receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 21 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for verification of foreign exchange receipts and related documentation. The Original Adjudicating Authority was directed to finalize the matter within two months, granting the appellant an opportunity to provide certified documents to support their claim. The decision affirmed the appellant&#039;s entitlement to a refund under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, subject to satisfactory verification of foreign exchange receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>